Studies and Technology for Syndesmosis Injury and Ankle Fracture
📚 Study by Naqvi et al. — This study, published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine in 2012, found that the Syndesmosis TightRope system improved reduction and maintenance of reduction compared to syndesmosis screws.
🔍 Research by Cottom et al. — Published in the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery in 2009, this research demonstrated better maintenance of reduction with the TightRope system compared to traditional screws.
📈 Outcomes by Laflamme et al. — A 2015 study in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma reported improved patient outcomes with the TightRope system over syndesmosis screws.
🦶 Case Report by Kale et al. — A 2024 case report highlighted the successful use of the TightRope system in a professional soccer player, emphasizing its benefits in early rehabilitation and hardware-free recovery.
📝 Study by Porter et al. — This 2014 study in the Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine discussed the effectiveness of the TightRope system in stabilizing syndesmosis injuries, supporting its use in operative treatment.
“The Syndesmosis TightRope® XP implant system features a unique delivery mechanism that allows surgeons to insert the implant without pulling a needle through the medial skin.”
Study Summaries
📖 Naqvi et al. (2012) — This study highlighted the advantages of the TightRope system in maintaining reduction and allowing early weight-bearing, which is crucial for patient recovery.
📊 Cottom et al. (2009) — The research focused on the mechanical stability provided by the TightRope system, showing superior results in maintaining syndesmosis reduction.
📝 Laflamme et al. (2015) — This study emphasized improved patient outcomes, including reduced need for implant removal and better functional recovery.
🦵 Kale et al. (2024) — A case report on a professional athlete demonstrated the TightRope system’s effectiveness in complex ankle injuries, supporting its use in high-demand patients.
🔬 Porter et al. (2014) — This study discussed the role of the TightRope system in operative management of syndesmosis injuries, highlighting its benefits over traditional screw fixation.
Clinical Outcomes
🏃 Early Rehabilitation — Studies show that the TightRope system supports early weight-bearing, which is crucial for faster rehabilitation and return to activity.
🔩 No Hardware Removal — Unlike traditional screws, the TightRope system often eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing patient burden.
📈 Improved Stability — Clinical outcomes indicate that the TightRope system provides better stability and maintenance of reduction compared to syndesmosis screws.
🩺 Patient Satisfaction — Patients report higher satisfaction due to less invasive procedures and quicker recovery times with the TightRope system.
🦿 Functional Recovery — The system allows for physiologic motion post-surgery, contributing to better functional recovery and reduced long-term complications.
“Supports early weightbearing and accelerated rehabilitation.”
Technological Advancements
🔧 Innovative Design — The TightRope system features a unique delivery mechanism that simplifies the surgical process and reduces tissue trauma.
⚙️ Material Options — Available in stainless steel and titanium, the system offers flexibility in material choice based on patient needs.
🛠️ Enhanced Tools — The system includes tensioning handles and a trocar-tipped drill bit, improving surgical precision and outcomes.
🧬 Physiologic Motion — The design allows for natural movement of the syndesmosis post-fixation, which is crucial for long-term joint health.
🔍 Research-Backed — Multiple studies support the system’s efficacy, making it a preferred choice for many orthopedic surgeons.
“The Syndesmosis TightRope® XP implant system features a unique delivery mechanism that allows surgeons to insert the implant without pulling a needle through the medial skin.”