Knee Procedures

MeniscusACL ReconstructionCollateral Ligament - MCL, LCL, PLCMPFL (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament) Back To Locations

Collateral Ligament - MCL, LCL, PLC

Collateral Ligament - MCL, LCL, PLC

Collateral Ligament - MCL, LCL, PLC

πŸ”§ Enhanced Stability β€” The Arthrex Internal Brace technique provides additional stabilization for ligament repairs, reducing the risk of failure and residual laxity post-operation.

⏱️ Faster Recovery β€” Patients using the Internal Brace technique often experience shorter immobilization times and a quicker return to physical activities.

πŸ“‰ Lower Failure Rates β€” Studies have shown that using the Internal Brace can result in lower failure rates compared to traditional suture-only repairs.

🦡 Improved Biomechanics β€” The technique enhances limb biomechanics, offering greater stiffness and maximum load capacity, which is crucial for early rehabilitation.

🧡 Proven Technology β€” The FiberTape suture used in the Internal Brace has been utilized in over 4 million cases, demonstrating its reliability and effectiveness.

Internal Brace Technique

πŸ› οΈ Technique Overview β€” The Internal Brace technique involves using a FiberTape suture to augment ligament repairs, providing a supportive scaffold for healing.

πŸ”— Soft-Tissue Fixation β€” It is designed for soft-tissue-to-bone fixation, enhancing the primary repair without replacing standard biologic augmentation.

🧬 Material Composition β€” The FiberTape is made from ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene, known for its strength and durability.

🦺 Safety and Efficacy β€” The technique is not cleared for bone-to-bone fixation, ensuring its use is focused on soft-tissue repairs.

πŸ“ˆ Adoption and Use β€” Over 4 million cases have utilized FiberTape, indicating widespread acceptance and trust in its efficacy.

Comparative Studies

πŸ“Š Study Findings β€” Research indicates that the Internal Brace technique results in improved stability and reduced laxity compared to traditional methods.

πŸ”¬ Clinical Trials β€” Randomized controlled trials have been conducted to assess the efficacy of the Internal Brace in ligament repairs.

πŸ“‰ Failure Rate Reduction β€” Studies show a significant decrease in failure rates when using the Internal Brace compared to suture-only repairs.

πŸ§ͺ Biomechanical Advantages β€” Enhanced stiffness and load capacity are noted benefits, supporting early rehabilitation efforts.

πŸ“š Literature Support β€” Numerous studies and clinical trials back the effectiveness of the Internal Brace technique in improving patient outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes

πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈReturn to Activity β€” Patients often return to sports and physical activities faster with the Internal Brace technique.

🩺 Post-Op Recovery β€” The technique supports a smoother and quicker post-operative recovery process.

πŸ“‰ Complication Rates β€” Lower complication rates are associated with the Internal Brace, enhancing overall patient satisfaction.

🦡Long-Term Stability β€” Patients report sustained stability and function in the long term following repairs with the Internal Brace.

πŸ“ˆ Patient Satisfaction β€” High levels of patient satisfaction are reported due to the reduced recovery time and improved outcomes.

Adding the _Internal_Brace technique to an MCL repair may result in lower failure rates and less residual laxity post-op as well as shorter immobilization times and faster return to play.

Sources

Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Tensionable Loops and Suture Tape Reinforcementjournals.sagepub.comLateral Collateral Ligament Injury of the Kneephysio-pedia.comMedial Collateral Ligament Injury of the Knee: A Review on Current Concept and Managementpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govInternalBraceβ„’ Technique for Collateral Ligament Injuries A review of the design rationale, techniques, and outcomesarthrex.comInternal brace augmentation reconstruction versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled clinical trial study protocolpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govCollateral Ligament Injuryarthrex.com