Collateral Ligament - MCL, LCL, PLC
π§ Enhanced Stability β The Arthrex Internal Brace technique provides additional stabilization for ligament repairs, reducing the risk of failure and residual laxity post-operation.
β±οΈ Faster Recovery β Patients using the Internal Brace technique often experience shorter immobilization times and a quicker return to physical activities.
π Lower Failure Rates β Studies have shown that using the Internal Brace can result in lower failure rates compared to traditional suture-only repairs.
𦡠Improved Biomechanics β The technique enhances limb biomechanics, offering greater stiffness and maximum load capacity, which is crucial for early rehabilitation.
𧡠Proven Technology β The FiberTape suture used in the Internal Brace has been utilized in over 4 million cases, demonstrating its reliability and effectiveness.
Internal Brace Technique
π οΈ Technique Overview β The Internal Brace technique involves using a FiberTape suture to augment ligament repairs, providing a supportive scaffold for healing.
π Soft-Tissue Fixation β It is designed for soft-tissue-to-bone fixation, enhancing the primary repair without replacing standard biologic augmentation.
𧬠Material Composition β The FiberTape is made from ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene, known for its strength and durability.
π¦Ί Safety and Efficacy β The technique is not cleared for bone-to-bone fixation, ensuring its use is focused on soft-tissue repairs.
π Adoption and Use β Over 4 million cases have utilized FiberTape, indicating widespread acceptance and trust in its efficacy.
Comparative Studies
π Study Findings β Research indicates that the Internal Brace technique results in improved stability and reduced laxity compared to traditional methods.
π¬ Clinical Trials β Randomized controlled trials have been conducted to assess the efficacy of the Internal Brace in ligament repairs.
π Failure Rate Reduction β Studies show a significant decrease in failure rates when using the Internal Brace compared to suture-only repairs.
π§ͺ Biomechanical Advantages β Enhanced stiffness and load capacity are noted benefits, supporting early rehabilitation efforts.
π Literature Support β Numerous studies and clinical trials back the effectiveness of the Internal Brace technique in improving patient outcomes.
Clinical Outcomes
πββοΈReturn to Activity β Patients often return to sports and physical activities faster with the Internal Brace technique.
π©Ί Post-Op Recovery β The technique supports a smoother and quicker post-operative recovery process.
π Complication Rates β Lower complication rates are associated with the Internal Brace, enhancing overall patient satisfaction.
π¦΅Long-Term Stability β Patients report sustained stability and function in the long term following repairs with the Internal Brace.
π Patient Satisfaction β High levels of patient satisfaction are reported due to the reduced recovery time and improved outcomes.
Adding the _Internal_Brace technique to an MCL repair may result in lower failure rates and less residual laxity post-op as well as shorter immobilization times and faster return to play.